A Tale of Two Forests: China and the Great Green Wall

Forests provide a massive bulwark against climate change; their continued existence and growth, alongside other efforts, are necessary to combat total climate catastrophe. While many countries only make the climate situation worse, China has advanced by leaps and bounds in reforestation and climate protection in recent decades. The world must look at China as a leader for clean energy and reforestation methods. One of many ways China is fighting climate change and choosing the planet over profits is their Great Green Wall—a project that fights climate change through forest expansion with the specific intent of stopping expansion of the Gobi desert.

China’s solution to continued expansion of the Gobi is to use expansion of their own—a massive afforestation project known as the Great Green Wall. The project, officially referred to as the Three-North Shelterbelt Program (TNSP), began in 1978 and is planned to reach completion in 2050, containing well over 100 billion trees. In 2019, China submitted a report to the United Nations with numerous notable points about the project:

• “TNSP has … greatly increased the forest cover and effectively combating desertification in the program area, improved the overall situation of serious wind-sand hazards and soil erosion, enhanced the resilience and adaptability to natural disasters and climate change”
  
  

• “Tens of millions of local people have been alleviated from poverty stably thanks to the development of forest and fruit related industries”
  
  

• “The Three-North Program has attracted tens of thousands of farmers to contract for harnessing barren hills and deserts, boosting forestry and increasing income, with 5 billion working days of labor having been input to the program in accumulation”
  
  

• “By 2030, efforts will be made to achieve the overall targets of the TNSP 15 years in advance”
  
  

• “By 2050, when the Program is completed, the ecological security shelterbelt system … will be completely accomplished”
  
  

First, the TNSP is working. As noted in regard to sandstorms, the amount of such storms per year has already decreased tremendously since the start of the project in 1978.

Second, it is more than just a tree planting project. The TNSP creates jobs and careers for people—whether that be forestry, fruit, farming, or other industries that have been created and benefited, the Chinese people are working toward a better future.

Third, the monumental project is potentially 15-20 years ahead of schedule.

The Great Green Wall is not just a good idea: there are large and measurable results seen in its success. No country has contributed more to the growth of forests than China in the past 20 years. Since 2000, China has contributed to 25% of global green leaf area growth. The TNSP and National-Tree Planting Day are both important factors that contribute to the achievement. As illustrated in the map above, China has contributed more to leaf area growth than any other country on earth, with India coming in second. The TNSP was not perfect when it was initially launched, and it is still not perfect. When the project was in its infancy, only 37% of planted saplings survived; however, in China’s previously mentioned UN report, they note that they were aware of the situation and made many changes to raise the rate by 23%, to 60%. The funding, learning, and technological advances continued and by the 1990s, the preservation rate was over 85%. President Xi Jinping has specifically spoken about the issue of quality:

“We will protect and manage our ecosystems involving mountains, rivers, forests, farmland, lakes, grasslands and deserts with a holistic approach, carry out greening programs systematically, and increase both quantity and quality of forest and grassland resources.”

The call is not just for the quantity of trees—planting 1 million trees means nothing if they all die. The call is for both quantity and quality—planting billions of trees where the vast majority live and flourish.

Given the amount of time required to grow trees, it does take some time to see the full impact—sometimes many years, even decades to see large qualitative changes. Planting one tree is a quantitative, measurable change, but how many does it take to achieve a qualitative change? There is no magic number for enough, because again quantity and quality must be considered. Many tree planting projects have failed in other countries and overall have served little to no purpose besides astroturfing the reputations of the same people and institutions most responsible for our impending ecological Armageddon. Learning from those failures is mandatory, as China has done, and improving the process instead of continuing the same, failed steps from before. It looks good on paper to declare that you are planting 1 billion trees, an initiative American ex-President Donald Trump pushed, but what good is it if those trees die within five years? What good are feel-good initiatives, often used as a moral pedestal from which to cast aspersions and brow-beat the global south, when the real material conditions are not only not improving, but continuing to decline? Here we see the clearest difference between Chinese ecological revitalization, and hollow American eco-fetishism.

The largest socialist power in the world today is also the global leader in clean energy, afforestation, and combating climate destruction. Countries and Communists across the globe should learn from the policies and actions of the People’s Republic as the climate crisis continues to worsen at the hands of the imperialist powers. Only socialism fully chooses the planet and people over profits. The climate struggle is also a class struggle—the rich continue to destroy the planet in pursuit of higher and higher profits while using their immense wealth to avoid as much of the repercussions as possible. 

In order to save the planet, we must destroy Capitalism.